Malta.
It’s that tiny smudge on your computer monitor just below Sicily. Of course, I
wasn’t always so well versed in geography. If someone had handed me a map a few
months ago and tasked me with finding Malta, I’d have begun the search in the
Pacific, around Australia. Today, I can smugly say that, yes, I know exactly
where it is. And once you’ve located Malta, finding Valetta is easy.
The
official language spoken by the people of Malta is Maltavion. It’s hard to
describe and for someone as linguistically challenged as myself. It’s even
harder to enunciate. To my ears it sounds like a mix of Greek and Italian or maybe
German, with Arabic roots. Luckily for the many mono-lingual tourists who visit
this island nation every year, Malta is, or once was, a member of the British
Commonwealth. I’m not exactly sure what it means to be a Commonwealth
nation, but for Malta it does mean that most people speak English and that cars
are driven on the wrong side of the road.
We’ve
been on several cruises and have come to expect some bureaucratic delays when
it comes to getting off a ship. In spite of the fact that cruise ships show up
one after the other and contribute significantly to the local economy, most
local customs officials act as though they’ve been caught unaware when one
shows up. The end result is that a 9:00AM departure can sometimes be delayed by
as much as 60 minutes. Or, as was the case in Rome, actually the port city of
Civitavecchia, up to 6 hours. Valletta turned out to be the exception to the
rule. We were able to get off the ship almost immediately after docking.
Wearing
only a short-sleeved shirt, and of course pants and shoes and such, we walked
through the terminal gates, without the need to push through the usual gaggle
of vendors and headed straight to the stairway that led to the city. A
little-used optional elevator was available to the left of the stairs. In
hindsight, a light jacket would have been a good idea for those cooler moments
when we weren’t bathed in sunlight.
Using
an approach we had taken previously, with varying degrees of success, our
excursion plan was no plan. Naturally, that’s not entirely true. We had
checked the ship’s planned excursions and even Googled Malta in order to get a
feel for what might be a plausible six-hour adventure. Similar to the brilliant
plan that we had concocted for Palermo, we opted to use the Hop-On/Hop-Off bus
as our primary means of transportation. Luckily, the bus-operations on Malta
seemed more straight-forward than they had been in Palermo.
The
city of Mdina was founded around 700 B.C., so nobody remembers what happened to
the missing vowel. We were able to hop-off the bus right outside the old-city
walls, very near to the main entrance.
Almost
immediately we were descended upon by the guided-tour, horse-drawn carriage
drivers. Initially it seemed that sitting in a small carriage behind the
back-end of a horse might be a fun thing to do. However, at a cost of 35 Euros,
we decided it would be just as well to walk. But the drivers were not so easily
discouraged by our dismissal.
“30
Euros,” they asked?
“No,
20 Euros,” we said.
“That’s
crazy,” they said.
“OK,
then” and we continued toward the gate.
“Wait,
wait,” a voice called to us. “20 Euros. We’ll do it.”
Having
unexpectedly won our haggling war we climbed aboard our carriage and began our
ride into the Silent City.
I’m not exactly sure why it’s called the silent city. It may be because there
is a convent within its walls. That probably keeps some of the revelers at bay.
Mdina also happens to be, mostly, a no-car zone, although there are some
exceptions, near the main gate, where certain vehicles may enter for special
purposes. Elsewhere in the city the roads are too narrow for a four-wheel,
motorized vehicle. Even our horse was feeling claustrophobic at times.
Inside
the walls there is no uncovered earth on which to walk on. Every
available surface, with the exception of a few box-gardens, is paved, I
believe with limestone, but I may be mistaken. In any event the “limestone”
hasn’t flaked away. Instead the centuries of foot traffic have polished the
stones to an almost glass-like finish. I image this place would be slicker than
ice in even the slightest rain.
The
city of Mdina may have been founded around 700 B.C. but, as is typical, what
stands today is the end result of centuries of construction and growth. There
are influences of Phoenicians, Byzantines, Arabs, and of course, the Knights of
Malta. The knight’s main contribution was the wall than envelopes the city.
Apparently the knights were unable to sleep at night without a big wall.
Typical
of the older cities in the Mediterranean region are the narrow and labyrinthine
streets. Once again we were informed of the necessity to design a town that
would be difficult for pirates to plunder and even more difficult for them to
escape. It would seem that all reliable sources agree, Mediterranean pirates
were a real problem in the 19th century.
We
thoroughly enjoyed our one-hour horse-drawn carriage tour, even if it did feel
as though it ended 40 minutes short of an hour. We learned more than a
few fun facts and some useful ones too. Such as, what was where within the city
walls and what did we want to re-visit. Once our driver had deposited us back
to the point of origination we proceeded by foot back into the city.
From
the standpoint of pointing out this landmark or that landmark, Mdina doesn’t
really work. There is no Pieta, or Eiffel Tower. The city stands on its own, as
a testament of itself. After all, it’s a place that has survived for over 24
centuries. And what makes that even more impressive is that Mdina is not a city
in ruins. It is very much alive—or at least as alive as a small walled-in city
with a convent can be. Within the walls there are two cathedrals, a convent and
the bishop’s residence. There is also the usual assortment of souvenir shops,
small restaurants, cafes, at least one tavern, and a five-star hotel—as rated
by the carriage driver. There are also a handful of permanent or
reasonably-permanent residents.
We
entered the courtyard of the Bishop’s residence. From there you could enter St.
Paul’s Cathedral or the cathedral museum. The cathedral and the museum each had
their own entry fees, and neither allowed photographs. We did enter into the foyer
of the cathedral museum, but that’s as far as we went. We may have been persuaded
to surrender cash if either had allowed photographs.
Our
decision not to enter St. Paul’s was validated just a few short meters where,
adjacent to the convent, was the Church of the Annunciation. Admission was free
AND they allowed photography.
Of
course, we can’t know for sure but I suspect that the Church of the
Annunciation was no less stunning than St. Paul’s may have been. As a bonus we
have the photographs to make our case! There were a few signs posted inside the
Church of the Annunciation indicating that there was ongoing restoration. It’s
possible that the cathedral was structurally unsound and about to collapse on
our heads, but we saw no signs of damage, nor any indication that any
restoration work was underway.
Officially
the Church of the Annunciation’s design is Baroque. In a way, Baroque simply means gaudy, but the craftsmanship
on display, from murals to statues is of such high quality that one is
overwhelmed by the beauty and ignores the otherwise over-stuffed aspect. Prominent
within Church of the Annunciation is a carved wooden frame, lightly gilded. Also
a statue of Our Lade of Mt. Carmel is prominently displayed.
After
being sufficiently awe-struck in the Church of the Annunciation we poked around
a few gift shops, where a few significant purchases were made. We stopped for lunch in a hidden café. I say
hidden because in order to get there you walked through the front entryway of
what appeared to be a centuries old forerunner to a New York City apartment
building. The café occupied a courtyard that was open to the sky, as well as an
interior space in the far side for the building. We had a fine lunch at the
restaurant, although I’m not sure that restaurant is the correct term to use
for this establishment. The menu was very limited: a few drink choices, bread,
cheese, and eggs. Perhaps there’s a different menu in the evening.
I can
only hope that I am not making Mdina sound dull. We spent the majority of our
Malta time in the Silent City. While we realized that there is so much
more to see and do in Malta, when you only have a few hours to spend, you need
to make choices. I think it’s safe to say that we don’t regret a minute spent
in Mdina, although it would have been nice to visit places like the Azure
Window, a famous natural limestone formation that collapsed into the sea only
days after we’d left.
Perhaps
Mdina is known as the silent city because you fail to hear time passing by
while you’re within its walls. By the time we boarded the bus, the better part
of the day was behind us. We might possibly make one more stop and end with a
mad-dash for the ship, or we could end our day in Malta in a more relaxed
manner. We chose the latter. We found seats on the upper, open portion of the
bus to take advantage of the warm sunshine on the ride back to the dock. Unlike
the bus tour in Palermo this bus ride covered a wide swath of the island
affording us a scenic, even if only a flyby, tour.
We
arrived near enough to the dock and with enough time remaining to enjoy a leisurely
walk along the sea-side roadway. There were a few diversions; a school bus
converted into a souvenir shop was one. There were also shops devoted to local
craftworks. Shopkeepers seem to be particularly proud of the Valletta Glass-Works.
The quality and variety of items on
display, from figurines inside glass bubbles to multi-colored lamps, would seem
to justify their pride.
And this
is where we end our trip to Malta. We descended the stairs connecting Valletta to
the dock. Tomorrow will be a day at sea as we head towards Barcelona!
No comments:
Post a Comment